Exposing the sales funnel to the sun: Dickie Bush teaches one-person companies not to do fifty more things, but to fix that one bottleneck

Two days ago, I spent an hour and a half listening to this episode of Personal IPO Podcast (opens in a new tab) interviewing Dickie Bush (opens in a new tab).

He studied finance at Princeton and worked at BlackRock. He made millions of dollars through online writing within a year after leaving his job. Now he and his partner Cole run a writing education group with an annual revenue of nearly 10 million U.S. dollars. They also operate five lines: Ship 30 for 30 (opens in a new tab), Write With AI, ghostwriting academy, agency services and community.

This kind of resume would look great in a fundraising presentation. But what really made me sit up straight was not the numbers, but his willingness to lay out the entire sales funnel in the sun and tell everyone about it.

He doesn’t talk about his thoughts, he directly draws the pipeline for you to see.

Most people who have achieved this level will stop at the level of mental methods when talking about success, and the more they talk, the more mysterious they become.

Dickie is the opposite. He directly draws the pipeline for you to see: all natural traffic is first funneled into a five-day email course, and then three types of emails are used to support the list, the value-based giving method, the indirect type of storytelling, the direct type before selling, and finally the high unit price transaction, relying on a layer of persuasion.

He divided the persuasion into three stages. First, let the other person believe that he needs to change, then believe that this method is feasible, and finally believe that you are the most suitable person to take him on this trip.

I kept nodding my head while listening to these three levels, because they are exactly what I have read over and over again in e-newsletters and course announcements in the past two years. The names of the magnet, sequence letter, and transaction page are different, but the skeleton is the same. I have always emphasized that really great content relies on the funnel journey to keep people, rather than blindly pursuing traffic. In March of this year, I used Build a Vibe Coding community in one day, and accumulated a list of 2,400 from 0, and I followed the same set of trends.

The only difference is that he has quantified every aspect so that he can change it week by week, while I often just rely on my feelings.

A jarring thing: find the only bottleneck

What really made me calm down was another sentence he said.

He said that after listening to a podcast, many people will excitedly list fifty things to do, and then fail to do any of them. What he wants you to do is exactly the opposite: treat the entire business as a funnel, find the only bottleneck at the moment, and put all your firepower into it.

This passage is a bit prickly for me.

Spreading out the list of projects I have now, vista.tw revision, the book “Unmanned Company”, advertising pipeline, academic research package, and several course lines, each one really exists and has its reason. But if I’m honest, I haven’t looked at any of them carefully with my funnel’s eye. I know that traffic can come in, but I can’t tell which section has the lowest conversion rate; I’m always adding things and rarely subtracting.

Dickie’s message is clear: growth does not come from opening another line, but from repairing the most painful link.

He took the initiative to cut the profit from 90% to 50%

The third thing that made me think about it for a long time was that he took the initiative to cut the profit margin from 90% to 50%.

An online writing business could have maintained a 90% gross profit and made a comfortable profit for one person, but he deliberately let the profits drop and replaced it with a team and the ability to produce products with higher unit prices.

My mood was a bit complicated when I listened to this section, because I happened to be walking in the other direction. What I am building is an unmanned company, using an army named Claude Code to supplement manpower and try not to expand. The underlying logic of this matter is explained more clearly in “Inverse Division of Labor”: when the software itself is the labor force, one person does have the opportunity to own an army.

On the face of it, our choices are opposite. But the underlying logic is actually the same: short-term comfort is exchanged for long-term production capacity caps. He uses people and I use AI. They are betting on the same thing, which is not to let themselves become the only bottleneck.

The difference is that he recognized early on that one person cannot carry a multi-million-dollar plate, while I am still testing how high can AI push this ceiling?

This episode reminded me that having no one does not mean that one person is holding on. It should be designed so that every link can operate without relying on me. This is exactly Mike. Gerber has talked about the old truth for decades in “The Road to Entrepreneurship”. I have also compiled Seven Keys to Building an Automatic Profit System: The boss should work on the career, rather than being tied up in the career.

Well, I occasionally mix up the two.

To survive the days when no one is watching, which number should you keep an eye on?

There is also a paragraph that may seem like an understatement, but is the most substantial part of the entire episode.

He said that the beginning was the most difficult period because the absolute numbers were so ugly that people wanted to give up. The only thing that can support you at this time is to look at the relative growth rate and see if your skills are growing. He himself wrote it for about forty weeks and survived with almost no reaction from the outside world.

I feel this very strongly, because the path of writing is to give first and then reap after a long time. I often tell students that they should be able to endure the days when no one is watching, but when it is their turn to face the deserted data of a new project, they will still be shaken. What can sustain you at this time is usually not inspiration, but discipline. After all, Inspiration can only write 500 words, discipline can write 100,000 words.

Don’t forget, There is never just one kind of writing bottleneck, and the coldness of numbers is only the most obvious layer of it.

Moving my eyes from absolute values ​​to growth rates and skill curves, this reminder is worth posting on my wall.

(opens in a new tab)

*▲ The skill curve is particularly obvious in the context of academic research and writing. If you are a researcher or knowledge worker and want to learn to collaborate with AI under a rigorous premise, welcome to my AI-empowered academic research and writing practical workshop (opens in a new tab). I will help you hand over the tedious work of document crawling and data compilation to AI, while maintaining the boundaries of academic ethics and keeping the most critical judgments, arguments, and original opinions firmly in your own hands. *

Where we finally landed, there is no methodology

I read the second half of the interview very quietly.

He talked about how his mother and father passed away from cancer one after another, and how that uncertainty changed his perspective on things. A person who has explained the sales funnel, conversion rate and profit structure so clearly ends up in a place where he regards life as a bifurcated branch line, which is about raising children, companionship, and knowing that some things cannot be measured or retained.

There is no methodology in this paragraph, but I think it is the real background of this episode.

We spend so much effort to optimize a business, in the final analysis, it is to buy back time and freedom of choice, rather than being tied up by the business.

I just want to ask two questions clearly

After listening to this, I didn’t rush to list fifty to-do items. I just want to ask two questions clearly.

First, among my business lines, which one is the most painful and needs to be repaired at the moment? Have I measured it?

Second, when I talk about no one, do I really design the system to not rely on me, or do I mean to put it another way, does it mean that one person is holding on to it?

Interestingly, I have already answered half of these two questions a while ago.

Recently, I developed a personal dashboard called PULSE, which brings together every business line, every work order, and the insights gained from every review into one picture. The motivation for doing it was very simple: I no longer wanted to guess by feel which line was bleeding and which line just looked busy. How it grew from daily review to a dashboard that will remind me back, I wrote a complete record separately.

What Dickie talked about using the sales funnel to find bottlenecks is actually what PULSE wants to do for me, which is to replace the intuition scattered everywhere into a vision that can be compared week by week.

Therefore, the most practical thing this episode gave me was that it forced me to go back and use the system I built.

Tonight I will open PULSE, copy down each business line, find out the most painful link, and review it: Which processes can really run without me, and which ones are actually supported by me alone?

After all, no matter how much you listen to other people’s methodologies, they are still theirs, but only if your own dashboard can reflect the true nature of others, can you really listen to them…

⋯ ✦ ⋯